- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- PR-4300 vs Luma 400 tragbarer HD
Denver PR-4300 vs Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
What PR-4300 does better (6) and where Luma 400 tragbarer HD wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Picture3.0
Why is PR-4300 better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)400 lm vs 200 lm2×
- Resolution (on screen)2560 × 1440 (QHD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Light source life50,000 h vs 3,500 h14.3×
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)8,000:1 vs 3,500:12.3×
- Native panel resolution2560 × 1440 (QHD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Audio outputYes · Luma 400 tragbarer HD: No
Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than PR-4300?
Luma 400 tragbarer HD has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 2560 × 1440 (QHD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 2560 × 1440 (QHD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 400 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 8,000:1 | 3,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | No | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 50,000 h | 3,500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | Grey, White | Black, White |
