How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. EF-100 vs PX725HD

Epson EF-100 vs ViewSonic PX725HD

What EF-100 does better (4) and where PX725HD wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Epson EF-100
Epson · 2019EF-100
7.0Score
4 advantages≈ US$1,350
Higher score
vs
ViewSonic PX725HD
ViewSonic · 2018PX725HD
3.6Score
4 advantages
3.4Picture3.6
9.0Noise, lifetime & portability2.6

Why is EF-100 better than PX725HD?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,500,000:1 vs 22,000:1113.6×
  2. Fan noise29 dB vs 34 dB+17%
  3. Power consumption172 W vs 310 W+80%
  4. Weight2.7 kg vs 2.94 kg+9%

Why is PX725HD better than EF-100?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 8 W+60%
  3. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  4. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

Epson EF-100Epson EF-100≈ US$1,3507.0
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology3LCDDLP
Light sourceLaser—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,000 lm2,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,500,000:122,000:1
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate—120 Hz
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.04:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.4:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.3 m—
Smallest image size30″—
Largest image size150″—
Optical zoom1.35×—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W8 W
Smart & streaming
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
HDMI version—1.4
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption172 W310 W
Light source life—3,500 h
Light source life (eco mode)—7,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise29 dB34 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)26 dB30 dB
Weight2.7 kg2.94 kg
Width210 mm—
Height92 mm—
Depth230 mm—
Colours—White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare