- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- EF-2X vs NeoPix 750
Epson EF-2X vs Philips NeoPix 750
What EF-2X does better (1) and where NeoPix 750 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
EF-2XNeoPix 750
| EF-2X | NeoPix 750 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 191 mm | 119 mm | +72 mm |
| Width | 197 mm | 305 mm | −108 mm |
| Depth | 113 mm | 319 mm | −206 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is EF-2X better than NeoPix 750?
- Largest image size150″ vs 120″+25%
Why is NeoPix 750 better than EF-2X?
- Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 14 W2.8×
- Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
- Audio outputNo · EF-2X: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | 3LCD | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | Laser | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,000 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 5,000,000:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.82:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.21 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | — |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 120″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | 14 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 23 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 19 dB | — |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | — |
| Width | 197 mm | 305 mm |
| Height | 191 mm | 119 mm |
| Depth | 113 mm | 319 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
