How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. EF-2X vs GamePix 900

Epson EF-2X vs Philips GamePix 900

What EF-2X does better (1) and where GamePix 900 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Epson EF-2X
Epson · 2024EF-2X
6.9Score
1 advantage≈ US$700
Higher score
vs
Philips GamePix 900
Philips · 2025GamePix 900
3 advantages≈ US$780
3.5Picture4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

EF-2XGamePix 900
197 × 191113238 × 115215
EF-2XGamePix 900Difference
Height191 mm115 mm+76 mm
Width197 mm238 mm−41 mm
Depth113 mm215 mm−102 mm
Weight2.3 kg2.3 kg=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is EF-2X better than GamePix 900?

  1. Largest image size150″ vs 120″+25%

Why is GamePix 900 better than EF-2X?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  2. Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
  3. Audio outputNo · EF-2X: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Epson EF-2XEpson EF-2X≈ US$7006.9
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technology3LCDDLP
Light sourceLaserLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,000 lm1,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000,000:1—
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate—120 Hz
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.82:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.21 m—
Smallest image size30″—
Largest image size150″120″
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesNo
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life20,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise23 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)19 dB—
Weight2.3 kg2.3 kg
Width197 mm238 mm
Height191 mm115 mm
Depth113 mm215 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare