How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. EH-QB1000 vs DLA-NZ500

Epson EH-QB1000 vs JVC DLA-NZ500

What EH-QB1000 does better (2) and where DLA-NZ500 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Epson EH-QB1000
Epson · 2024EH-QB1000
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$5,900
Higher score
vs
JVC DLA-NZ500
JVC · 2024DLA-NZ500
2 advantages≈ US$5,600
6.7Picture4.3

Why is EH-QB1000 better than DLA-NZ500?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,300 lm vs 500 lm6.6×
  2. Light source life20,000 h vs 500 h40×

Why is DLA-NZ500 better than EH-QB1000?

  1. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  2. 4K method4K by pixel shifting vs Native 4K
Specifications

Side by side

Epson EH-QB1000Epson EH-QB1000≈ US$5,9008.4
JVC DLA-NZ500JVC DLA-NZ500≈ US$5,600
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
4K method4K by pixel shiftingNative 4K
Display technology3LCDLCoS (SXRD / D-ILA)
Light source—Laser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,300 lm500 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000:1—
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10+, HDR10, HLG—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.35:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)2.84:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.99 m—
Smallest image size50″—
Largest image size300″—
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs2—
USB portYes—
Ethernet (LAN)No—
VGA inputNo—
Audio outputNo—
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life20,000 h500 h
Design & noise
Weight12.8 kg—
Width520 mm—
Height193 mm—
Depth447 mm—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare