- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Lifestudio Pop EF-62 vs Halo+
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62 vs XGIMI Halo+
What Lifestudio Pop EF-62 does better (3) and where Halo+ wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Picture7.7
6.0Setup & placement8.1
6.8Smart features & sound7.5
6.8Noise, lifetime & portability3.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Lifestudio Pop EF-62Halo+
| Lifestudio Pop EF-62 | Halo+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 75 mm | 172 mm | −97 mm |
| Width | 199 mm | 114 mm | +85 mm |
| Depth | 190 mm | 145 mm | +45 mm |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 1.6 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Lifestudio Pop EF-62 better than Halo+?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Fan noise24 dB vs 30 dB+25%
- 4K method4K by pixel shifting vs 4K input only (downscaled)
Why is Halo+ better than Lifestudio Pop EF-62?
- Automatic keystone correctionNo · Lifestudio Pop EF-62: Yes
- Power consumption95 W vs 90 W+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | 4K input only (downscaled) |
| Display technology | 3LCD | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 700 lm | 700 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 5,000,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10, HLG | HDR10, HLG |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | — |
| Largest image size | 150″ | — |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | Yes |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Yes |
| Automatic screen fit | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | Android TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 16 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI eARC | Yes | Yes |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | — | Yes |
| Battery capacity | — | 59 Wh |
| Power consumption | 95 W | 90 W |
| Light source life | — | 25,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 24 dB | 30 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 20 dB | — |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 1.6 kg |
| Width | 199 mm | 114 mm |
| Height | 75 mm | 172 mm |
| Depth | 190 mm | 145 mm |
| Colours | — | Black, Silver |
Related comparisons
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61vsEpson Lifestudio Pop EF-62
8.78.9
vs
Nebula P1vsEpson Lifestudio Pop EF-62
9.08.9
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62vsTCL PlayCube
8.99.0
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62vsEpson Lifestudio Flex EF-72
8.99.7
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62vsONOAYO ONO3Pro
8.99.3
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62vsViewSonic M1S