How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Lifestudio Pop EF-62 vs MoGo

Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62 vs XGIMI MoGo

What Lifestudio Pop EF-62 does better (3) and where MoGo wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62
8.9Score
3 advantages≈ US$690
Higher score
vs
XGIMI MoGo
XGIMI · 2026MoGo
1 advantage≈ US$930
9.7Picture7.4

Why is Lifestudio Pop EF-62 better than MoGo?

  1. Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)700 lm vs 450 lm+56%
  3. Audio outputYes · MoGo: No

Why is MoGo better than Lifestudio Pop EF-62?

  1. Weight1.6 kg vs 1.32 kg+21%
Specifications

Side by side

XGIMI MoGoXGIMI MoGo≈ US$930
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting—
Display technology3LCDDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)700 lm450 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000,000:1—
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10, HLG—
Gaming
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m—
Smallest image size30″—
Largest image size150″—
Lens shiftNone—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TV—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Chromecast built-inYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI eARCYes—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption95 W—
Light source life—25,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise24 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)20 dB—
Weight1.6 kg1.32 kg
Width199 mm—
Height75 mm—
Depth190 mm—
Colours—Grey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare