- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Lifestudio Pop EF-62 vs MoGo 4 Laser
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62 vs XGIMI MoGo 4 Laser
What Lifestudio Pop EF-62 does better (5) and where MoGo 4 Laser wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Picture7.0
6.0Setup & placement8.4
6.8Smart features & sound8.2
6.8Noise, lifetime & portability6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Lifestudio Pop EF-62MoGo 4 Laser
| Lifestudio Pop EF-62 | MoGo 4 Laser | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 75 mm | 208 mm | −133 mm |
| Width | 199 mm | 96 mm | +103 mm |
| Depth | 190 mm | 96 mm | +94 mm |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 1.3 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Lifestudio Pop EF-62 better than MoGo 4 Laser?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)700 lm vs 550 lm+27%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000,000:1 vs 1,000:15,000×
- Audio outputYes · MoGo 4 Laser: No
- Fan noise24 dB vs 28 dB+17%
Why is MoGo 4 Laser better than Lifestudio Pop EF-62?
- Automatic keystone correctionNo · Lifestudio Pop EF-62: Yes
- Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 12 W+20%
- Power consumption95 W vs 65 W+46%
- Largest image size150″ vs 200″+33%
- Weight1.6 kg vs 1.32 kg+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | 3LCD | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 700 lm | 550 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 5,000,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10, HLG | HDR10 |
| Colour gamut (DCI-P3) | — | 90% |
| Colour gamut (BT.2020) | — | 110% |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Input lag | — | 20 ms |
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 200″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | Yes |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Yes |
| Automatic screen fit | — | Yes |
| Built-in stand / gimbal | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 12 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 32 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI eARC | Yes | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | — | Yes |
| Battery capacity | — | 71 Wh |
| Battery life (video) | — | 2.5 h |
| USB-C power input (power bank) | — | Yes |
| Power consumption | 95 W | 65 W |
| Light source life | — | 25,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 24 dB | 28 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 20 dB | — |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 1.32 kg |
| Width | 199 mm | 96 mm |
| Height | 75 mm | 208 mm |
| Depth | 190 mm | 96 mm |
| Colours | — | Grey, Silver |
Related comparisons
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61vsEpson Lifestudio Pop EF-62
8.78.9
vs
Nebula P1vsEpson Lifestudio Pop EF-62
9.08.9
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62vsTCL PlayCube
8.99.0
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62vsEpson Lifestudio Flex EF-72
8.99.7
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62vsONOAYO ONO3Pro
8.99.3
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62vsViewSonic M1S