- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Whale Pro vs Neopix 950
ETOE Whale Pro vs Philips Neopix 950
What Whale Pro does better (2) and where Neopix 950 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Picture3.1
6.8Setup & placement9.0
7.7Smart features & sound5.5
Why is Whale Pro better than Neopix 950?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,500 lm vs 1,400 lm+7%
- Largest image size200″ vs 150″+33%
Why is Neopix 950 better than Whale Pro?
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Audio outputNo · Whale Pro: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | 3LCD |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,500 lm | 1,400 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,100:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 200″ | 150″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 20 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant | — |
| Internal storage | 16 GB | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 27 dB |
| Weight | — | 4.3 kg |
| Colours | Black | Black |
