- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- ESP-300 vs IR150WF
Extralink ESP-300 vs Irradio IR150WF
What ESP-300 does better (0) and where IR150WF wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is ESP-300 better than IR150WF?
ESP-300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is IR150WF better than ESP-300?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)120 lm vs 150 lm+25%
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs0 vs 1
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 120 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 2,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | — | 170″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 0 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 2,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | White | Black |
