- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Xming Page One vs Crusader Challenger IN3008SL
Formovie Xming Page One vs InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SL
What Xming Page One does better (2) and where Crusader Challenger IN3008SL wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Picture6.3
6.8Smart features & sound9.2
2.4Noise, lifetime & portability3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Xming Page OneCrusader Challenger IN3008SL
| Xming Page One | Crusader Challenger IN3008SL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 190 mm | 128 mm | +62 mm |
| Width | 207 mm | 147 mm | +60 mm |
| Depth | 127 mm | 130 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 1.3 kg | +0.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Xming Page One better than Crusader Challenger IN3008SL?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm vs 350 lm+43%
- Fan noise30 dB vs 35 dB+17%
Why is Crusader Challenger IN3008SL better than Xming Page One?
- Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 20 W2×
- Internal storage16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Weight2 kg vs 1.3 kg+54%
- Largest image size120″ vs 130″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 500 lm | 350 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 2,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10 | HDR10, HLG |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.25:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.77 m | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | 40″ | 45″ |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 130″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 20 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | Yes |
| Internal storage | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | 2.1 | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | — | Yes |
| Power consumption | 100 W | — |
| Light source life | — | 25,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | 35 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 28 dB |
| Weight | 2 kg | 1.3 kg |
| Width | 207 mm | 147 mm |
| Height | 190 mm | 128 mm |
| Depth | 127 mm | 130 mm |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Formovie Xming Page OnevsViewSonic M10
5.85.6
vs
Formovie Xming Page OnevsKodak Ultra
vs
Formovie Xming Page OnevsNebula Mars II Pro
vs
InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SLvsIrradio IR150WF
vs
InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SLvsViewSonic M10
5.95.6
vs
InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SLvsKodak Ultra