How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. HY300 vs NeoPix 106

H&Y HY300 vs Philips NeoPix 106

What HY300 does better (0) and where NeoPix 106 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

H&Y HY300
H&Y · 2026HY300
0 advantages≈ US$120
vs
Philips NeoPix 106
Philips · 2026NeoPix 106
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ US$110
Higher score

Why is HY300 better than NeoPix 106?

HY300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is NeoPix 106 better than HY300?

  1. Light source life500 h vs 30,000 h60×
Specifications

Side by side

H&Y HY300H&Y HY300≈ US$120
Philips NeoPix 106Philips NeoPix 106≈ US$1104.0
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—60 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)500 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—500:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Largest image size—50″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—2 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs—1
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life500 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—0.51 kg
Width—158 mm
Height—73 mm
Depth—121 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare