- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- CC500 vs IR150WF
HP CC500 vs Irradio IR150WF
What CC500 does better (3) and where IR150WF wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is CC500 better than IR150WF?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)260 lm vs 150 lm+73%
- Light source life20,000 h vs 2,000 h10×
- Audio outputYes · IR150WF: No
Why is IR150WF better than CC500?
- Largest image size80″ vs 170″2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 260 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 2,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.25:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.77 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 45″ | — |
| Largest image size | 80″ | 170″ |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 95 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 2,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 32 dB | — |
| Colours | Grey, Silver, White | Black |
