- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- MP250 vs Luma 350
HP MP250 vs Kodak Luma 350
What MP250 does better (2) and where Luma 350 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is MP250 better than Luma 350?
- Internal storage16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Weight0.6 kg vs 0.73 kg+22%
Why is Luma 350 better than MP250?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm vs 350 lm+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 250 lm | 350 lm |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | — |
| Largest image size | — | 200″ |
| Lens shift | Vertical | — |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Internal storage | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 45 W | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.6 kg | 0.73 kg |
| Width | 80 mm | — |
| Height | 140 mm | — |
| Depth | 80 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | White |
