How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. MP250 vs NeoPix 320

HP MP250 vs Philips NeoPix 320

What MP250 does better (1) and where NeoPix 320 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

HP MP250
HP · 2022MP250
5.0Score
1 advantage≈ US$330
vs
Philips NeoPix 320
Philips · 2022NeoPix 320
7.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$410
Higher score
2.9Picture5.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

MP250NeoPix 320
80 × 14080216 × 93246
MP250NeoPix 320Difference
Height140 mm93 mm+47 mm
Width80 mm216 mm−136 mm
Depth80 mm246 mm−166 mm
Weight0.6 kg1.2 kg−0.6 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MP250 better than NeoPix 320?

  1. Weight0.6 kg vs 1.2 kg2×

Why is NeoPix 320 better than MP250?

  1. Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 10 W+67%
  3. Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  4. Audio outputNo · MP250: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

HP MP250HP MP250≈ US$3305.0
Philips NeoPix 320Philips NeoPix 320≈ US$4107.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPLCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm250 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:11.4:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m3.1 m
Lens shiftVertical—
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)6 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
AirPlay—Yes
Internal storage16 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption45 W—
Light source life—20,000 h
Design & noise
Weight0.6 kg1.2 kg
Width80 mm216 mm
Height140 mm93 mm
Depth80 mm246 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare