- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- MP250 vs PicoPix Micro 2TV
HP MP250 vs Philips PicoPix Micro 2TV
What MP250 does better (3) and where PicoPix Micro 2TV wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Picture2.5
8.6Setup & placement6.2
Why is MP250 better than PicoPix Micro 2TV?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm vs 200 lm+25%
- Lens shiftVertical vs None
- AutofocusYes · PicoPix Micro 2TV: No
Why is PicoPix Micro 2TV better than MP250?
- Automatic keystone correctionNo · MP250: Yes
- Audio outputNo · MP250: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 250 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 600:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | 2.66 m |
| Largest image size | — | 100″ |
| Lens shift | Vertical | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Internal storage | 16 GB | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | — | Yes |
| Power consumption | 45 W | — |
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.6 kg | — |
| Width | 80 mm | — |
| Height | 140 mm | — |
| Depth | 80 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
