- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Apex Challenger IN3048SL vs NeoPix 140
InFocus Apex Challenger IN3048SL vs Philips NeoPix 140
What Apex Challenger IN3048SL does better (6) and where NeoPix 140 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Picture2.4
Why is Apex Challenger IN3048SL better than NeoPix 140?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 150 lm+33%
- Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 3 W2×
- Light source life25,000 h vs 20,000 h+25%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
- Largest image size100″ vs 65″+54%
Why is NeoPix 140 better than Apex Challenger IN3048SL?
- Weight1.25 kg vs 0.3 kg4.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10, HLG | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 60″ | — |
| Largest image size | 100″ | 65″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 25,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 1.25 kg | 0.3 kg |
| Width | — | 68 mm |
| Height | — | 142 mm |
| Depth | — | 74 mm |
| Colours | Black | — |
