- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- L018 vs NeoPix 140
Magcubic L018 vs Philips NeoPix 140
What L018 does better (4) and where NeoPix 140 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Setup & placement2.1
Why is L018 better than NeoPix 140?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)20,000:1 vs 1,000:120×
- Largest image size300″ vs 65″4.6×
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
Why is NeoPix 140 better than L018?
NeoPix 140 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 150 lm |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 650 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 20,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | 40″ | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | 65″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 0.3 kg |
| Width | — | 68 mm |
| Height | — | 142 mm |
| Depth | — | 74 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
