- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Apex Challenger IN3048SL vs PT-1
InFocus Apex Challenger IN3048SL vs Rollei PT-1
What Apex Challenger IN3048SL does better (5) and where PT-1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Picture3.5
Why is Apex Challenger IN3048SL better than PT-1?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Wi-FiYes · PT-1: No
- Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 5 W+20%
- Weight1.25 kg vs 1.5 kg+20%
Why is PT-1 better than Apex Challenger IN3048SL?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 220 lm+10%
- Largest image size100″ vs 200″2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 220 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 5,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10, HLG | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | 1.44:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | 3.19 m |
| Smallest image size | 60″ | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 100″ | 200″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | 5 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 25,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 1.25 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
