- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- IN0048SL vs IN1089SL
InFocus IN0048SL vs InFocus IN1089SL
What IN0048SL does better (5) and where IN1089SL wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is IN0048SL better than IN1089SL?
- Light source life15,000 h vs 4,500 h3.3×
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · IN1089SL: No
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · IN1089SL: No
- Audio outputYes · IN1089SL: No
Why is IN1089SL better than IN0048SL?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,400 lm vs 4,500 lm+2%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)30,000:1 vs 300,000:110×
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
- HDMI version1.4 vs 2+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Lamp | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,400 lm | 4,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 30,000:1 | 300,000:1 |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.13:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.47:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.5 m | — |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| HDMI version | 1.4 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 267 W | — |
| Light source life | 15,000 h | 4,500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 27 dB | — |
| Weight | 2.9 kg | — |
| Width | 313 mm | — |
| Height | 236 mm | — |
| Depth | 96 mm | — |
| Colours | White | White |
