How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. IN1039 vs VPL-GTZ380

InFocus IN1039 vs Sony VPL-GTZ380

What IN1039 does better (3) and where VPL-GTZ380 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

InFocus IN1039
InFocus · 2022IN1039
5.8Score
3 advantages
Higher score
vs
Sony VPL-GTZ380
Sony · 2022VPL-GTZ380
2 advantages≈ US$85,000
7.4Picture9.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

IN1039VPL-GTZ380
345 × 26199560 × 262760
IN1039VPL-GTZ380Difference
Height261 mm262 mm−1 mm
Width345 mm560 mm−215 mm
Depth99 mm760 mm−661 mm
Weight3.3 kg51 kg−47.7 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is IN1039 better than VPL-GTZ380?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)50,000:1 vs 16,000:13.1×
  2. Weight3.3 kg vs 51 kg15.5×
  3. Audio outputYes · VPL-GTZ380: No

Why is VPL-GTZ380 better than IN1039?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,200 lm vs 10,000 lm2.4×
  2. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K)
Specifications

Side by side

Sony VPL-GTZ380Sony VPL-GTZ380≈ US$85,000
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)—
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLampLaser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,200 lm10,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)50,000:116,000:1
HDR supportNo—
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate85 Hz—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.26:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)2.09:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.79 m—
Optical zoom4×—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNoNo
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)16 W—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
HDMI version1.4—
USB-C video input—Yes
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)YesYes
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption340 W—
Light source life20,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise32 dB—
Weight3.3 kg51 kg
Width345 mm560 mm
Height261 mm262 mm
Depth99 mm760 mm
ColoursWhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare