How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. IN1039 vs Halo+ GTV

InFocus IN1039 vs XGIMI Halo+ GTV

What IN1039 does better (7) and where Halo+ GTV wins (2) — every spec side by side.

InFocus IN1039
InFocus · 2022IN1039
5.8Score
7 advantages
Higher score
vs
XGIMI Halo+ GTV
XGIMI · 2022Halo+ GTV
2 advantages≈ US$540
7.4Picture2.7

Why is IN1039 better than Halo+ GTV?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,200 lm vs 900 lm4.7×
  2. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)50,000:1 vs 200:1250×
  4. Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  5. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  6. Ethernet (LAN)Yes · Halo+ GTV: No
  7. Audio outputYes · Halo+ GTV: No

Why is Halo+ GTV better than IN1039?

  1. Light source life20,000 h vs 25,000 h+25%
  2. Weight3.3 kg vs 1.6 kg2.1×
Specifications

Side by side

XGIMI Halo+ GTVXGIMI Halo+ GTV≈ US$540
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLampLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,200 lm900 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)50,000:1200:1
HDR supportNo—
3D playback—Yes
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate85 Hz—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.26:11.2:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)2.09:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.79 m2.66 m
Largest image size—120″
Optical zoom4×—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)16 W—
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
HDMI version1.4—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)YesNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption340 W—
Light source life20,000 h25,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise32 dB—
Weight3.3 kg1.6 kg
Width345 mm—
Height261 mm—
Depth99 mm—
ColoursWhiteGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare