- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- IN1068SL vs IN1089SL
InFocus IN1068SL vs InFocus IN1089SL
What IN1068SL does better (5) and where IN1089SL wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is IN1068SL better than IN1089SL?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)7,000 lm vs 4,500 lm+56%
- Light source life30,000 h vs 4,500 h6.7×
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · IN1089SL: No
- Audio outputYes · IN1089SL: No
Why is IN1089SL better than IN1068SL?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 7,000 lm | 4,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 300,000:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 2.04:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | — |
| Optical zoom | 1.7× | — |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 30 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 195 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 4,500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 36 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 33 dB | — |
| Weight | 6.1 kg | — |
| Colours | White | White |
