- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs IN1068SL
Acer QT12 vs InFocus IN1068SL
What QT12 does better (0) and where IN1068SL wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than IN1068SL?
QT12 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is IN1068SL better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 30,000 h4.6×
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 7,000 lm+8%
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · QT12: Yes
- Audio outputNo · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 7,000 lm |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 2.04:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 30″ |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.7× |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 30 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 195 W |
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 36 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 33 dB |
| Weight | — | 6.1 kg |
| Colours | White | White |
