- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- INL148 vs UHZ45
InFocus INL148 vs Optoma UHZ45
What INL148 does better (1) and where UHZ45 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Why is INL148 better than UHZ45?
- Power consumption161 W vs 230 W+43%
Why is UHZ45 better than INL148?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,000 lm vs 3,800 lm+27%
- HDMI inputs1 vs 33×
- Built-in speakers (total output)15 W vs 20 W+33%
- Fan noise30 dB vs 29 dB+3%
- Weight5.5 kg vs 4.8 kg+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,000 lm | 3,800 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 2,000,000:1 | 2,000,000:1 |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.13:1 | 1.5:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.47:1 | 1.66:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.5 m | 3.32 m |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | 1.3× | — |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 15 W | 20 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 3 |
| HDMI version | — | 2 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 161 W | 230 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | 29 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 28 dB | 27 dB |
| Weight | 5.5 kg | 4.8 kg |
| Width | — | 337 mm |
| Height | — | 120 mm |
| Depth | — | 265 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
