How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. INL148 vs VPL-XW7000ES

InFocus INL148 vs Sony VPL-XW7000ES

What INL148 does better (3) and where VPL-XW7000ES wins (7) — every spec side by side.

InFocus INL148
InFocus · 2022INL148
7.6Score
3 advantages
vs
Sony VPL-XW7000ES
Sony · 2022VPL-XW7000ES
8.9Score
7 advantages
Higher score
4.1Picture7.8
8.3Noise, lifetime & portability5.2

Why is INL148 better than VPL-XW7000ES?

  1. Power consumption161 W vs 420 W2.6×
  2. Weight5.5 kg vs 14 kg2.5×
  3. Audio outputYes · VPL-XW7000ES: No

Why is VPL-XW7000ES better than INL148?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  2. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,000 lm vs 3,200 lm+7%
  3. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  4. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  5. Ethernet (LAN)No · INL148: Yes
  6. Fan noise30 dB vs 26 dB+15%
  7. Optical zoom1.3× vs 2.1×+62%
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
4K method—Native 4K
Display technologyDLPLCoS (SXRD / D-ILA)
Light sourceLaserLaser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,000 lm3,200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000,000:1—
HDR support—Yes
Motion interpolation (MEMC)—Yes
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.13:11.35:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.47:12.84:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.5 m2.99 m
Optical zoom1.3×2.1×
Lens shift—Vertical and horizontal
Autofocus—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)15 W—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoYes
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption161 W420 W
Light source life30,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise30 dB26 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)28 dB—
Weight5.5 kg14 kg
Width—460 mm
Height—210 mm
Depth—517 mm
ColoursWhite—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare