How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. INL148 vs LX700-4K

InFocus INL148 vs ViewSonic LX700-4K

What INL148 does better (2) and where LX700-4K wins (6) — every spec side by side.

InFocus INL148
InFocus · 2022INL148
7.6Score
2 advantages
vs
ViewSonic LX700-4K
ViewSonic · 2023LX700-4K
9.4Score
6 advantages
Higher score
4.1Picture8.4
8.3Noise, lifetime & portability8.4

Why is INL148 better than LX700-4K?

  1. Fan noise30 dB vs 31 dB+3%
  2. Power consumption161 W vs 180 W+12%

Why is LX700-4K better than INL148?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  2. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,000 lm vs 3,500 lm+17%
  3. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  4. Weight5.5 kg vs 3.3 kg+67%
  5. Optical zoom1.3× vs 2×+54%
  6. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000,000:1 vs 3,000,000:1+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLaserLaser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,000 lm3,500 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000,000:13,000,000:1
HDR support—Yes
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Game / low-latency mode—Yes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.13:11.06:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.47:11.45:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.5 m2.35 m
Smallest image size—30″
Largest image size—300″
Optical zoom1.3×2×
Lens shift—Vertical
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)15 W15 W
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption161 W180 W
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise30 dB31 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)28 dB26 dB
Weight5.5 kg3.3 kg
Width—286 mm
Height—129 mm
Depth—216 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare