How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Nemesis IN1028ST vs UHZ66

InFocus Nemesis IN1028ST vs Optoma UHZ66

What Nemesis IN1028ST does better (1) and where UHZ66 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

InFocus Nemesis IN1028ST
InFocus · 2024Nemesis IN1028ST
8.4Score
1 advantage≈ US$1,150
vs
Optoma UHZ66
Optoma · 2023UHZ66
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$1,250
Higher score
5.8Picture8.9
6.7Setup & placement6.1
8.2Noise, lifetime & portability8.8

Why is Nemesis IN1028ST better than UHZ66?

  1. Optical zoom2× vs 1.6×+25%

Why is UHZ66 better than Nemesis IN1028ST?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  2. Maximum refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
  3. Fan noise32 dB vs 30 dB+7%
  4. Power consumption195 W vs 185 W+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Optoma UHZ66Optoma UHZ66≈ US$1,2509.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLaserLaser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm4,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—500,000:1
HDR support—Yes
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz240 Hz
Game / low-latency mode—Yes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio0.5:11.4:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)—2.24:1
Throw typeShort throw (0.4–1.0:1)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image1.11 m3.1 m
Smallest image size—26″
Largest image size—303″
Optical zoom2×1.6×
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)15 W15 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
HDMI version—2
HDMI eARC—Yes
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)YesYes
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption195 W185 W
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise32 dB30 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)26 dB28 dB
Weight—3 kg
Width—274 mm
Height—114 mm
Depth—216 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare