How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. IR150WF vs PicoFlix

Irradio IR150WF vs JMGO PicoFlix

What IR150WF does better (1) and where PicoFlix wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Irradio IR150WF
Irradio · 2024IR150WF
1 advantage≈ US$250
vs
JMGO PicoFlix
JMGO · 2024PicoFlix
7.9Score
3 advantages≈ US$350
Higher score
3.7Picture6.0

Why is IR150WF better than PicoFlix?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:1 vs 400:15×

Why is PicoFlix better than IR150WF?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm vs 420 lm2.8×
  2. Light source life2,000 h vs 25,000 h12.5×
  3. Largest image size170″ vs 200″+18%
Specifications

Side by side

Irradio IR150WFIrradio IR150WF≈ US$250
JMGO PicoFlixJMGO PicoFlix≈ US$3507.9
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—DLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm420 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:1400:1
HDR support—Yes
HDR formats—HDR10
Colour gamut (BT.2020)—110%
3D playback—Yes
Gaming
Game / low-latency mode—Yes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Smallest image size—40″
Largest image size170″200″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Built-in stand / gimbal—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital Plus—Yes
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Google TV
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI eARC—Yes
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in battery—Yes
Battery life (video)—4.5 h
Power consumption—65 W
Light source life2,000 h25,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—26 dB
Weight—1.5 kg
Width—80 mm
Height—230 mm
Depth—80 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare