- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- IR150WF vs Luma 150
Irradio IR150WF vs Kodak Luma 150
What IR150WF does better (4) and where Luma 150 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is IR150WF better than Luma 150?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:1 vs 1,500:1+33%
- Largest image size170″ vs 150″+13%
Why is Luma 150 better than IR150WF?
Luma 150 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 2,000:1 | 1,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 170″ | 150″ |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 2,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | Black | — |
