- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- IR150WF vs NeoPix 244
Irradio IR150WF vs Philips NeoPix 244
What IR150WF does better (0) and where NeoPix 244 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.7Picture5.5
Why is IR150WF better than NeoPix 244?
IR150WF has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is NeoPix 244 better than IR150WF?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm vs 250 lm+67%
- Light source life2,000 h vs 30,000 h15×
- Audio outputNo · IR150WF: Yes
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:1 vs 3,000:1+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 250 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 2,000:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 170″ | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 6 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 2.1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 2,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 30 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 26 dB |
| Weight | — | 1.4 kg |
| Width | — | 140 mm |
| Height | — | 187 mm |
| Depth | — | 239 mm |
| Colours | Black | White |
