- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- IR150WF vs PicoPix Micro
Irradio IR150WF vs Philips PicoPix Micro
What IR150WF does better (2) and where PicoPix Micro wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.7Picture3.4
Why is IR150WF better than PicoPix Micro?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:1 vs 500:14×
- Largest image size170″ vs 80″2.1×
Why is PicoPix Micro better than IR150WF?
- Light source life2,000 h vs 30,000 h15×
- Audio outputNo · IR150WF: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 2,000:1 | 500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 170″ | 80″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Own / Linux platform |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 2,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | Black | — |
