- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- IR150WF vs C1
Irradio IR150WF vs TCL C1
What IR150WF does better (2) and where C1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is IR150WF better than C1?
- Largest image size170″ vs 120″+42%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:1 vs 1,500:1+33%
Why is C1 better than IR150WF?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm vs 230 lm+53%
- Audio outputNo · IR150WF: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | — | 3LCD |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 230 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 2,000:1 | 1,500:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.27:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.81 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 170″ | 120″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 8 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Internal storage | — | 18 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | — | Yes |
| Light source life | 2,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 30 dB |
| Weight | — | 1.77 kg |
| Width | — | 138 mm |
| Height | — | 205 mm |
| Depth | — | 145 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
