- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- O2 vs V-LED50
JMGO O2 vs Krüger & Matz V-LED50
What O2 does better (3) and where V-LED50 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is O2 better than V-LED50?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · V-LED50: No
- Audio outputYes · V-LED50: No
Why is V-LED50 better than O2?
V-LED50 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | Laser | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 2,800 lm | 2,800 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | — | 120″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 20 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Internal storage | 64 GB | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 50,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 45 dB |
| Weight | — | 2 kg |
| Width | — | 300 mm |
| Height | — | 150 mm |
| Depth | — | 200 mm |
| Colours | Grey | Grey |
