How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. PicoFlix vs Ultra

JMGO PicoFlix vs Kodak Ultra

What PicoFlix does better (1) and where Ultra wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JMGO PicoFlix
JMGO · 2024PicoFlix
7.9Score
1 advantage≈ US$350
Higher score
vs
Kodak Ultra
Kodak · 2024Ultra
0 advantages

Why is PicoFlix better than Ultra?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)420 lm vs 100 lm4.2×

Why is Ultra better than PicoFlix?

Ultra has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

JMGO PicoFlixJMGO PicoFlix≈ US$3507.9
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)—
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)—
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)420 lm100 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)400:1—
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10—
Colour gamut (BT.2020)110%—
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m—
Smallest image size40″—
Largest image size200″—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Built-in stand / gimbalYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W—
Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital PlusYes—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TV—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Chromecast built-inYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI eARCYes—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in batteryYes—
Battery life (video)4.5 h—
Power consumption65 W—
Light source life25,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise26 dB—
Weight1.5 kg—
Width80 mm—
Height230 mm—
Depth80 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare