- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- DLA-N7B vs DLA-NZ8
JVC DLA-N7B vs JVC DLA-NZ8
What DLA-N7B does better (5) and where DLA-NZ8 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
DLA-N7BDLA-NZ8
| DLA-N7B | DLA-NZ8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 234 mm | 234 mm | = |
| Width | 500 mm | 500 mm | = |
| Depth | 495 mm | 505 mm | −10 mm |
| Weight | 19.8 kg | 23 kg | −3.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DLA-N7B better than DLA-NZ8?
- Resolution (on screen)4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Lens shiftVertical and horizontal vs None
- Native panel resolution4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Weight19.8 kg vs 23 kg+16%
- Power consumption400 W vs 440 W+10%
Why is DLA-NZ8 better than DLA-N7B?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,900 lm vs 2,500 lm+32%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| 4K method | Native 4K | Native 4K |
| Display technology | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | Lamp | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,900 lm | 2,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 80,000:1 | 80,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Lens shift | Vertical and horizontal | None |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 400 W | 440 W |
| Light source life | 4,500 h | — |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 24 dB |
| Weight | 19.8 kg | 23 kg |
| Width | 500 mm | 500 mm |
| Height | 234 mm | 234 mm |
| Depth | 495 mm | 505 mm |
| Colours | — | Black |
