- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- DLA-NZ8 vs NeoPix Prime 2
JVC DLA-NZ8 vs Philips NeoPix Prime 2
What DLA-NZ8 does better (5) and where NeoPix Prime 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Picture2.2
Why is DLA-NZ8 better than NeoPix Prime 2?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,500 lm vs 180 lm13.9×
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)80,000:1 vs 3,000:126.7×
- Native panel resolution3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · NeoPix Prime 2: No
Why is NeoPix Prime 2 better than DLA-NZ8?
- Weight23 kg vs 3 kg7.7×
- Audio outputNo · DLA-NZ8: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| 4K method | Native 4K | — |
| Display technology | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) | — |
| Light source | Laser | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 2,500 lm | 180 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 80,000:1 | 3,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | — |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.3:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.88 m |
| Largest image size | — | 80″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 16 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 440 W | — |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 24 dB | — |
| Weight | 23 kg | 3 kg |
| Width | 500 mm | — |
| Height | 234 mm | — |
| Depth | 505 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Silver, Black |
