- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- DLA-NZ500 vs UHZ55
JVC DLA-NZ500 vs Optoma UHZ55
What DLA-NZ500 does better (2) and where UHZ55 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is DLA-NZ500 better than UHZ55?
- Native panel resolution3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- 4K methodNative 4K vs 4K by pixel shifting
Why is UHZ55 better than DLA-NZ500?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm vs 3,000 lm6×
- Light source life500 h vs 30,000 h60×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | Native 4K | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 500 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 2,500,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | No |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.21:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.59:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.68 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 35″ |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.3× |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 20 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 3 |
| HDMI version | — | 2 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | Yes |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 230 W |
| Light source life | 500 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 29 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 27 dB |
| Weight | — | 4.8 kg |
| Width | — | 337 mm |
| Height | — | 120 mm |
| Depth | — | 265 mm |
| Colours | — | Black |
