How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. DLA-NZ500 vs NeoPix 730

JVC DLA-NZ500 vs Philips NeoPix 730

What DLA-NZ500 does better (2) and where NeoPix 730 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JVC DLA-NZ500
JVC · 2024DLA-NZ500
2 advantages≈ US$5,600
vs
Philips NeoPix 730
Philips · 2023NeoPix 730
8.9Score
1 advantage
Higher score

Why is DLA-NZ500 better than NeoPix 730?

  1. Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Native panel resolution3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)

Why is NeoPix 730 better than DLA-NZ500?

  1. Light source life500 h vs 30,000 h60×
Specifications

Side by side

JVC DLA-NZ500JVC DLA-NZ500≈ US$5,600
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K methodNative 4K—
Display technologyLCoS (SXRD / D-ILA)—
Light sourceLaserLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.65:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.65 m
Largest image size—120″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—20 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs—2
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—100 W
Light source life500 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—2.7 kg
Width—305 mm
Height—119 mm
Depth—319 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare