- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- DLA-NZ7 vs UHR90DV
JVC DLA-NZ7 vs Optoma UHR90DV
What DLA-NZ7 does better (4) and where UHR90DV wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is DLA-NZ7 better than UHR90DV?
- Native panel resolution3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- 4K methodNative 4K vs 4K by pixel shifting
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Fan noise24 dB vs 28 dB+17%
Why is UHR90DV better than DLA-NZ7?
- Weight22.5 kg vs 14.8 kg+52%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | Native 4K | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 5,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 40,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | HDR10+, HLG, Dolby Vision |
| Dolby Vision | — | Yes |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | Yes | — |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.35:1 | 1.25:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 2.76:1 | 2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.99 m | 2.77 m |
| Smallest image size | 60″ | — |
| Largest image size | 200″ | — |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.6× |
| Lens shift | Vertical and horizontal | — |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | — |
| VGA input | Yes | — |
| Audio output | Yes | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 24 dB | 28 dB |
| Weight | 22.5 kg | 14.8 kg |
| Width | — | 486 mm |
| Height | — | 186 mm |
| Depth | — | 432 mm |
| Colours | Black | — |
