- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs UHR90DV
Acer QT12 vs Optoma UHR90DV
What QT12 does better (1) and where UHR90DV wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than UHR90DV?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 5,000 lm+30%
Why is UHR90DV better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 5,000 lm |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, HLG, Dolby Vision |
| Dolby Vision | — | Yes |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.25:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.77 m |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.6× |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | No | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 28 dB |
| Weight | — | 14.8 kg |
| Width | — | 486 mm |
| Height | — | 186 mm |
| Depth | — | 432 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
