- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- DLA-NZ700 vs DLA-NZ8
JVC DLA-NZ700 vs JVC DLA-NZ8
What DLA-NZ700 does better (5) and where DLA-NZ8 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
DLA-NZ700DLA-NZ8
| DLA-NZ700 | DLA-NZ8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 180 mm | 234 mm | −54 mm |
| Width | 450 mm | 500 mm | −50 mm |
| Depth | 479 mm | 505 mm | −26 mm |
| Weight | 15.2 kg | 23 kg | −7.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DLA-NZ700 better than DLA-NZ8?
- Resolution (on screen)4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Native panel resolution4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Fan noise23 dB vs 24 dB+4%
- Power consumption280 W vs 440 W+57%
- Weight15.2 kg vs 23 kg+51%
Why is DLA-NZ8 better than DLA-NZ700?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,300 lm vs 2,500 lm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| 4K method | Native 4K | Native 4K |
| Display technology | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 2,300 lm | 2,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 80,000:1 | 80,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 200″ | — |
| Optical zoom | 1.6× | — |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 280 W | 440 W |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 23 dB | 24 dB |
| Weight | 15.2 kg | 23 kg |
| Width | 450 mm | 500 mm |
| Height | 180 mm | 234 mm |
| Depth | 479 mm | 505 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
