- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- DLA-NZ900 vs TYY0061
JVC DLA-NZ900 vs TopVision TYY0061
What DLA-NZ900 does better (5) and where TYY0061 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is DLA-NZ900 better than TYY0061?
- Resolution (on screen)4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)150,000:1 vs 12,000:112.5×
- Native panel resolution4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · TYY0061: No
Why is TYY0061 better than DLA-NZ900?
- Weight25.3 kg vs 6.9 kg3.7×
- Audio outputNo · DLA-NZ900: Yes
- Largest image size300″ vs 350″+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | Native 4K | — |
| Display technology | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | Laser | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,300 lm | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 9,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 150,000:1 | 12,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | — |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.28:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 2.61:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.83 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 60″ | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | 350″ |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 440 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 24 dB | — |
| Weight | 25.3 kg | 6.9 kg |
| Width | 500 mm | — |
| Height | 234 mm | — |
| Depth | 528 mm | — |
| Colours | — | White |
