- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs DLA-NZ900
Acer QT12 vs JVC DLA-NZ900
What QT12 does better (1) and where DLA-NZ900 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than DLA-NZ900?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 3,300 lm+97%
Why is DLA-NZ900 better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 20,000 h3.1×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) |
| 4K method | — | Native 4K |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 3,300 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 150,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.28:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 2.61:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.83 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 60″ |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 440 W |
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 24 dB |
| Weight | — | 25.3 kg |
| Width | — | 500 mm |
| Height | — | 234 mm |
| Depth | — | 528 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
