- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Elegance Cinema Pro vs Luma 400 tragbarer HD
Kiano Elegance Cinema Pro vs Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
What Elegance Cinema Pro does better (4) and where Luma 400 tragbarer HD wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Picture3.0
Why is Elegance Cinema Pro better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)900 lm vs 200 lm4.5×
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Light source life5,000 h vs 3,500 h+43%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than Elegance Cinema Pro?
Luma 400 tragbarer HD has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 900 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,500:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | No | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | 1.4 | — |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 5,000 h | 3,500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | — | Black, White |
