- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- FLIK HD9 vs NeoPix 250
Kodak FLIK HD9 vs Philips NeoPix 250
What FLIK HD9 does better (0) and where NeoPix 250 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Picture2.2
Why is FLIK HD9 better than NeoPix 250?
FLIK HD9 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is NeoPix 250 better than FLIK HD9?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 250 lm+25%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)800:1 vs 3,000:13.8×
- Largest image size150″ vs 200″+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | — |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | — |
| 4K method | — | 4K input only (downscaled) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 250 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 800:1 | 3,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.31:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.9 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 80″ |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 200″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 6 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 2.5 kg |
| Width | — | 239 mm |
| Height | — | 188 mm |
| Depth | — | 141 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
