Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs Xiaomi Cube2 Pro

What Luma 400 tragbarer HD does better (0) and where Cube2 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

0 advantages

Xiaomi · 2026Cube2 Pro

6.4Score

5 advantages≈ US$200

Higher score

3.0Picture7.9

Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than Cube2 Pro?

Luma 400 tragbarer HD has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Only differences	Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD	Xiaomi Cube2 Pro≈ US$2006.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)	1280 × 720 (HD)	1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution	1280 × 720 (HD)	1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology	DLP	—
Light source	LED	LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)	200 lm	500 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)	3,500:1	—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio	—	1.2:1
Throw type	—	Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image	—	2.66 m
Smallest image size	—	40″
Largest image size	—	120″
Lens shift	—	None
Autofocus	—	No
Keystone correction	—	Yes
Automatic keystone correction	—	No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)	—	6 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform	—	Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform	—	Yes
Wi-Fi	—	Yes
Bluetooth	—	Yes
Voice assistant	—	Google Assistant
Internal storage	—	16 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs	1	1
USB port	Yes	Yes
Ethernet (LAN)	No	No
VGA input	No	No
Audio output	No	Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life	3,500 h	20,000 h
Design & noise
Weight	—	0.9 kg
Colours	Black, White	—