- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- LV-HD240 Wi-Fi 2000lm vs NeoPix 160
La Vague LV-HD240 Wi-Fi 2000lm vs Philips NeoPix 160
What LV-HD240 Wi-Fi 2000lm does better (0) and where NeoPix 160 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Smart features & sound2.4
Why is LV-HD240 Wi-Fi 2000lm better than NeoPix 160?
LV-HD240 Wi-Fi 2000lm has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is NeoPix 160 better than LV-HD240 Wi-Fi 2000lm?
- Light source life2,000 h vs 30,000 h15×
- Audio outputNo · LV-HD240 Wi-Fi 2000lm: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 250 lm |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 2,000 lm | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | — |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 5 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Fire TV | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 2,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 1.23 kg |
| Width | — | 207 mm |
| Height | — | 147 mm |
| Depth | — | 171 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
