How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. CineBeam Q Mini PU600U vs M1S

LG CineBeam Q Mini PU600U vs ViewSonic M1S

What CineBeam Q Mini PU600U does better (3) and where M1S wins (0) — every spec side by side.

LG CineBeam Q Mini PU600U
8.0Score
3 advantages≈ US$840
Higher score
vs
ViewSonic M1S
ViewSonic · 2025M1S
0 advantages≈ US$610

Why is CineBeam Q Mini PU600U better than M1S?

  1. Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
  2. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
  3. Wi-FiYes · M1S: No

Why is M1S better than CineBeam Q Mini PU600U?

M1S has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

ViewSonic M1SViewSonic M1S≈ US$610
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)854 × 480 (480p)
4K method4K by pixel shifting—
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLaserLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)600 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)450,000:1—
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10—
Motion interpolation (MEMC)Yes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:11:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m2.21 m
Smallest image size50″—
Largest image size120″—
Lens shiftNoneNone
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)4 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformwebOS (LG)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYesNo
BluetoothYesYes
Voice assistantLG ThinQ—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs1—
HDMI eARCYes—
USB portYes—
Ethernet (LAN)No—
VGA inputNo—
Audio outputNo—
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in battery—Yes
Design & noise
Weight1.49 kg—
Width80 mm—
Height135 mm—
Depth135 mm—
ColoursGrey—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare