How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs CineBeam Q Mini PU600U

Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs LG CineBeam Q Mini PU600U

What Luma 400 tragbarer HD does better (0) and where CineBeam Q Mini PU600U wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
0 advantages
vs
LG CineBeam Q Mini PU600U
8.0Score
4 advantages≈ US$840
Higher score
3.0Picture9.5

Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than CineBeam Q Mini PU600U?

Luma 400 tragbarer HD has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is CineBeam Q Mini PU600U better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 600 lm3×
  2. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500:1 vs 450,000:1128.6×
  4. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLaser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm600 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500:1450,000:1
HDR support—Yes
HDR formats—HDR10
Motion interpolation (MEMC)—Yes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Smallest image size—50″
Largest image size—120″
Lens shift—None
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—4 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—webOS (LG)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Voice assistant—LG ThinQ
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI eARC—Yes
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life3,500 h—
Design & noise
Weight—1.49 kg
Width—80 mm
Height—135 mm
Depth—135 mm
ColoursBlack, WhiteGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare